Who is really to blame for Russo-Ukrainian crisis?

Pokerstars melanjutkan dominasinya terhadap saya

I read all the history and background and lead up to the present war (in conventional Western sources not Russian ones) and I found that globalist EU & NATO & US & Soros & Jewish involvement and interests and influence and interference in Ukraine & Eastern Europe from a least 1988-2014 was the real cause of the crisis, and poor Ukraine is like a pawn. This influence was both from outside (like Soros), and from inside (pro-EU/-NATO “Ukrainians” like Zelensky). It was/is more hidden/subtle/covert and with a more cunning clever psychologically appealing cover (“freedom, democracy, peace, rights, nationalism”, promiscuity, etc). The Western propaganda and media don’t say anything about this background and they falsely make it all out to be poor Ukraine, bad Russia/Putin, good champion West. (They cleverly “make black look white, and white look black” as they have bragged eslewhere.) The West is wagging a massive war of deceptive psychological words and pictures.

The Ukrainian president Zelensky and pro-EU/-NATO “Ukrainians” and the West/World are globalists and don’t really care about Ukraine. The Ukrainian president Zelensky is not even a Ukrainian, he is Jewish. It is unfortunate that he is Jewish because that means we can’t say anything against him without them rolling out the old “anti-Semitism” accusation. I don’t care whether he is Jewish, British, American, Chinese or the Pink Panther, the fact is he is not Ukrainian, and thus he doesn’t really have the best interests of Ukraine & Ukrainians at heart. Imagine if he was Russian or German or Muslim, there would be suspicion, but because he is Jewish we can’t say anything. We sort of see the same concept in rules that a US presdiential candidate has to be a US citizen, and in anti-nationalist posts about Hitler allegedy getting German citizenship by jugglery. Zelensky is not the only Jew involved either, the article against Ukrainian nationalists was written by Cohen (a Jewish name), and the Economist article was written by another person with a seemingly Jewish name (Yuval Noah Harari), so it is not just “anti-Semitism”, otherwise why are a number of Jews involved in subterfuge “for” Ukraine (but really for globalism and against Ukraine) and against Russia? (Ie we are only anti them where they are anti our cultures.) On the other hand Putin is a close friend of a Jewish family, and the Russian prime minister is Jewish, and a number of other Russian office holders and backers/bankers are Jewish. So its not all simply “anti-Semitism”.
Fighting for “Ukraine” doesn’t make Zelensky Ukrainian either, because he is not fighting for Ukraine/Ukrainians but for globalism. If “Ukraine”/West wins Ukraine goes into the EU & NATO which really means going into globalism and there will be no Ukraine except in mere name & pretense.
There were pictures posted on Twitter of the Ukrainian president Zelensky’s past dancing on ‘Dancing with the Stars’. They were lewd and moral morass filth promiscuity. Yet people praise it & him as if they something good. What more proof do we need that he is for globalist filth and not really for a decent quality Ukraine nation?
They say the Ukrainian president is a “hero” standing “for Ukraine” against “big Russian invader/bully”. But he is not standing for Ukraine he is standing for globalism. Rather Russia/Putin is more of a hero, the whole world has been tricked into believing they are the culprits, and the whole world is against them.

The claims that the US and the present US President and previous ones failed to prevent this crisis and failed to respond with support and aid is just a petty sideline. The truth is that Globalist (NATO & EU & US & Soros etc) influence and interest and interference in Ukraine from at least 1988-2014 to the present was the real cause of this crisis, and all the presidents except possibly Trump did nothing about that or were/are actually doing/promoting/supporting it.

Posts saying “Russia is violating international boundaries” and “if Ukraine stops fighting there will be no more Ukraine” are not true. Because if Ukraine/NATO wins Ukraine goes into the EU & NATO & free trade & globalism and there will be no more Ukraine except in mere name and pretense. Globalism is against national boundaries/borders/barriers.

The following quotes are some quotes from some conventional/mainstream Western sources confirming that it was globalist influence in Ukraine (by EU/NATO/US/Soros “friend” enemies outside Ukraine, and by “friend” enemies like Zelensky inside Ukraine) that was the real cause of the conflict.

“The ongoing crisis stems from the protracted Russo-Ukrainian War that began as an unrest in early 2014.”

“Activists of the Orange Revolution were funded and trained in tactics of political organisation and nonviolent resistance by Western pollsters and professional consultants who were partly funded by Western government and non-government agencies but received most of their funding from domestic sources. According to The Guardian, the foreign donors included the U.S. State Department and USAID along with the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, the International Republican Institute, the NGO Freedom House and George Soros’s Open Society Institute. The National Endowment for Democracy has supported democracy-building efforts in Ukraine since 1988. Writings on nonviolent struggle by Gene Sharp (American politicl scientist) contributed in forming the strategic basis of the student campaigns.”

“On 7 February 2014, a leaked audio revealed that United States Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland in Kyiv, was weighing in on the make-up of the next Ukrainian government. Nuland told United States Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt that she did not think Vitaly Klitschko should be in a new government.”

“On 1 January 2016, Ukraine joined the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area with European Union….”

“2016 Ukraine and United States were jointly building virus labs, and working on medical surveillance in Ukraine”.

“Ukraine considers Euro-Atlantic integration its primary foreign policy objective”

“Ukraine’s induction into the Western alliance system would mean that the US missiles could hit Moscow in 5 minutes, rendering Russian air defence systems ineffectual and obsolete”.

“In December 2021, Russia advanced two draft treaties that contained requests for what it referred to as “security guarantees”, including a legally binding promise that Ukraine would not join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as well as a reduction in NATO troops and military hardware stationed in Eastern Europe, and threatened unspecified military response if those demands were not met in full. NATO has rejected these requests, and the United States warned Russia of “swift and severe” economic sanctions should it further invade Ukraine.”

No where do I see any clear majority blame of Russia except for possibly only one bit:

“At the same time, there were several sticking points, most importantly Ukraine’s significant nuclear arsenal, which Ukraine agreed to abandon in the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances (December 1994) on the condition that Russia (and the other signatories) would issue an assurance against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine. In 1999, Russia was one of signatories of Charter for European Security, where it “reaffirmed the inherent right of each and every participating State to be free to choose or change its security arrangements, including treaties of alliance, as they evolve”.”

But it also says:

“He insisted that, if Ukraine signed the agreement, it would violate the bilateral treaty on strategic partnership and friendship with Russia that delineates the countries borders.”

(Plus “Russia had agreed to reunification of Germany on condition that NATO would not expand further East.”)

And a far as the Crimea is concerned:

“Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea, which has been home to the Russian/Soviet Black Sea Fleet, from the Russian SFSR to the Ukrainian SSR in 1954.”

(And if I remember right Russia or Cossacks had taken the Khanate of Krim, so it is questionable whether it was ever really part of an independent Ukrainian state?)

If it was a free choice of Ukraine without external influence/interference from the West (and without influence of inside “friend” enemies like Zelensky) to join NATO & EU, and if it was all Ukrainians choice not just the choice of the government or only some sectional interests to join NATO & EU, then it maybe would be more acceptable. But it doesn’t seem like it was/is, it seems like there was/is alot of influcence from the West (and insiders), and that it was/is not all or a majority of Ukrainians’ choice. And anyway even if it was, Russia also has the right to defend itself from any globalist Western NATO/EU threat.

I do concede that these following quotes do make it sound/seem like a majority of Ukrainians support joining the EU & NATO:

“All major political parties in Ukraine support full eventual integration into the European Union.
“Petro Poroshenko, running on a pro-European Union platform, won with over fifty percent of the vote”

But these quotes cast some doubt on that:

“Some Ukrainians took to the streets to show their support for closer ties with Europe.”
“In October 2014 Parliament elections, Petro Poroshenko Bloc “Solidarity” won 132 of the 423 contested seats.” (Note only 132 out of 423!)

Plus Ukraine also has 17 percent Russians/GreatRussians to 77 percent Ukrainians / Little Russians / Ruthenians.
And besides which I never agree with a majority dictating to minority. History shows that the best are always a minority and the rest a majority. The majority can be unduly influenced by media and psychology and money etc. And even if only one person that person matters and has rights/value. And political parties don’t necessarily genuinely represent all the people.

Historically Ukraine is one of the 3 Russias and was part of the Varangian/Rus Rurikid kingdom. That kingdom split up into principalities including Kiev in Ukraine, and was later reunited by Muscovy (similar to Wessex in England, Prussia in Germany, Piedmont/Savoy/Sardinia in Italy, etc, and similar to Carolingian empire being split up in 800s and reunited in EEC etc). Ukraine was under Polish/Lithuanian rule for some time between the spliting up and reunification. It was only independent for a short one or two/few times like the Cossack Hetmanate.
Ukraine and Russia are both Slavic (both in the 3 Russias), and both Germanic Rus/Varangians. Though Ukraine was supposed to have sizeable German population (invited by Catherine apparently).
So I don’t see it as just being so simple as a Soviet and/or Russian invasion of Eastern Europe as some suggest. Rather it is a NATO/Western/Globalist invasion of Eastern Europe.

I think Putin/Russia maybe made a mistake invading, though I suspect possibly he might have been forced to by Western/Ukrainian threat behind the scenes (much like Germany was forced to invade the USSR prematurely too close to winter after being delayed in the Balkans, because the USSR was in already in manouvers), though we don’t know what the strategy plans of Putin/Russia are.
Interestingly I wondered whether Putin invading in winter would be a repeat of Napoleon and Hitler, and yesterday I saw news claiming Russians may freeze in tank convoy. Though it is moving into spring soon since winter is ending soon here in NZ.

In conclusion I think that the above facts and quotes show that it is not true this crisis is just Putin/Russia being some bully invader, but that the globalists outside and inside Ukraine are the real culprits. The very fact that there are so many Western anti-Putin/-Russia posts everywhere is enough to make one wonder.

I’m not just some pro-Putin/-Russia “fascist”, I always try to think for myself and to find the truth and to see the root cause(s) of everything. I often stand up for the underdog or the “heretic” and speak out against injust wrongs.
When Putin put Navalny in prison I spoke out saying I thought it seemed wrong/over-harsh, even though I’m not a fan of Navalny who seems to be globalist.
But in this case they falsely make it look like Zelensky and “Ukraine” are the underdog, when the real underdog is actually Putin & Russia. Contrary to Russia/Putin being the “bully/invader”, rather Putin is a hero. He has the whole “international” against him threatening him and falsely making him out to be bad, and Putin/Russia is isolated, and Putin is standing defending Russia and having to make grave decisions under pressure.
The Western regime are always blaming the victims, and they are always falsely pretending to stand for minorities, but they only care about some groups where it suits/serves their interests, while they don’t care about many others of us suffering under their globalist social/economic/cultural regime. They claim to stand for freedom, peace, democracy, rights, and nationalism/independence in Ukraine and the world yet many of us are suffering wrongs caused by this globalist regime, eg sugar heaped foods & fluoridation, mass unemployment (caused by free trade (the same thing they are pushing in Ukraine)), housing crisis (caused by immigration) & excessively expensive house prices/rents & homelessness, promiscuity everywhere & abortion, etc).
Though I also acknowledge that many Ukrainians are suffering from the war, but it is hard to have alot of sympathy since they surely know they are fighting for NATO, EU, US, Soros, Jews like Zelensky, and outirght lairs. Alot of news can be faked too so its hard to know whether alleged wrongs are true or not.
I’m not all pro-Putin/-Russia. There are some things I like and some I don’t like about them. Though I think he is better than alot of Western “leaders”.

I saw a UN post on twitter only a day or two ago saying would should always speak out against wrongs/injustices. Yet often in the West we are persecuted if we have spoken out against injustice/wrongs in our regime/country. Another UN post today said we should be careful about sharing information during such a crisis as this, as misinformation/disinformation can harm. Yet the last week or so I’ve seen heaps of Western World posts against Putin & Russia which I know are untrue from what I have read of the history of the crisis. This is not unique, it has happened alot. I am reminded of a good example from my own life. In high school the teacher got us to read the German and Soviet versions of the Katyin forest massacre and then he asked who thinks the Germans did it and everyone put their hands up except for me. Then he asked who thought the Soviets did it and I put up my hand (everyone looked around). (I genuinely thought the German version sounded more truthful.) Then the teacher told the class that Gorbachev had recently let out information that the Soviets had done it. This just shows how easy it is for the majority beliefs to be deceived by regime psychology tactics.

Regarding Ukrainian president Zelensky he is not such a white knight hero as everyone is made to believe. Consider these quotes from one source:

“Zelensky supported the late 2013 and early 2014 Euromaidan movement.”
“During his presidential campaign, Zelenskyy said that he supported Ukraine’s becoming a member of the European Union and NATO….”
“Zelenskyy’s close advisor Ivan Bakanov also said that Zelenskyy’s policy is supportive of membership of both the EU and NATO….”
“The program states that Ukraine should set the goal to apply for a NATO Membership Action Plan in 2024. The programme also states that Zelenskyy “will do everything to ensure” that Ukraine can apply for European Union membership in 2024.”
“Zelenskyy’s first official trip abroad as president was to Brussels in June 2019, where he met with European Union and NATO officials.”

“In September 2019, it was reported that U.S. President Donald Trump had allegedly blocked payment of a congressionally mandated $400 million military aid package to Ukraine in order to pressure Zelenskyy during a July phone call between the two presidents to investigate alleged wrongdoing by Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden, who took a board seat on Ukrainian natural gas company Burisma Holdings.”

“On a trip to the United States in September 2021, Zelenskyy engaged in talks and commitments with U.S. President Joe Biden, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken.”

“Zelenskyy stated that as president he would develop the economy and attract investment to Ukraine through “a restart of the judicial system” and restoring confidence in the state. He also proposed a tax amnesty and a 5 per cent flat tax for big business which could be increased “in dialogue with them and if everyone agrees”.”

“Zelenskyy supports the free distribution of medical cannabis, free abortion in Ukraine, and the legalisation of prostitution and gambling.”

“he stated in April 2019 that he regarded Russian President Vladimir Putin “as an enemy”.”

“The October 2021 Pandora Papers revealed that Zelenskyy and his chief aide, Sergey Shefir, and the head of the Security Service of Ukraine Ivan Bakanov operated a network of offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands, Cyprus, and Belize. These companies included some that owned expensive London property. Around the time of his 2019 election, Zelenskyy handed his shares in a key offshore company over to Shefir, but the two men appear to have made an arrangement for Zelenskyy’s family to continue receiving the money from these companies. …. In a 17 October 2021 interview with ICTV Zelenskyy did not deny that in 2012 he used offshore companies.”

“His assets were worth about 37 million hryvnias (about $1.5 million USD) in 2018.”

It is clear he is pro globalist, capitalist, free-trade, corporatist, big buisness, investment, etc, and not really for the best interest(s) of Ukraine & Ukrainians.

Some nationalists take a neutral stance. This is like a third Ukrainian nationalist side instead of either of the two Western/Ukrainian & Russian sides. I agree with Ukrainian nationalism, and I do agree that Russia/Putin is not all good either (though not as bad as West lyingly making out), and that Ukrainians are suffering in the war. But in this present crisis I don’t see how it is possible to be neutral as a third side because Ukrainian nationalists are not in any position of power at present or some years/decades to come, and if they are not standing against NATO/EU/US then they are siding with them or letting them win and Putin/Russia loose (as the whole world is against the latter). (Picture common enemy & common interest.) I don’t see that siding with Putin/Russia against NATO/West/International is in any way detrimental to Ukrainian nationalists. Putin/Russia is not necessarily against Ukrainian nationalism, even though they claimed he invaded to “de-Nazify” Ukraine, as it seems they are really defending against globalist NATO/EU threat, and Ukraine wouldn’t necessarily be subservient to Russia/Putin. It is not like the East/USSR vs West/US. So I don’t see why we can’t both side with Putin against NATO/international threat and also support Ukrainian nationaists (if they are not pro globalist NATO/EU). If NATO wins Ukraine and possibly Russia go into NATO & EU & globalism. I’m not against a nationalist European union, but the EU is globalist.

A Biblical viewpoint.
These are some interesting verses which relate to the present crisis.
The bible says “the truth will set you free”. When I read the history of this conflict and saw the real cause(s) it was like that. (Though the real Truth with a capital T is God/Jesus. I think Trump made a mistake to imply the Truth equates with Trump.)
The bible also says there will be wars and rumours of wars. (I know someone who said there was news of a war in a country when someone there said there was no such war.)
There is also another verse in Revelation that says “If anyone leads into captivity, into captivity he goes. If anyone will kill with the sword, he must be killed with a sword.” That is much like what the modern western world regime does to others like Miloshevic, Hussein, Putin, etc.
The bible also says “when they say peace and safety then will sudden destruction fall upon them”. It seems they will apparently acheive their fake global “paradise”, no more wars, no more crime, no more racism, no more sexism, etc, but it won’t last for long.
The bible also says the harlot “Babylon”/Rome rides the beast (UN/G7/NATO/EU/US) and influences the kings/rulers of the world and oversees global free trade, and is to blame for most wars, martyrdoms, murders. They are behind globalism, maybe also Putin too since he is a christian and the Pope has been tricking all christians into believing he has Peter’s keys and authority, and someone says “the word on the street is … Putin had a visitation from our Lord and responded favorably to the visit!”
Another verse says we war not against flesh and blood but against spiritual principalities and powers.


Another article written by “Goldman” might imply Goldman-Sachs?

Origin of the Rus:

The Rus or Varangians are usually supposed to be Norse Vikings from Sweden or Denmark. They were able to travel down/up the rivers in Russia, and carrying their boats/ships from one river to another. They even reached Byzantium/Constantinople. There are a number of Norse and Germanic words in Russian, eg yakor “anchor”, knut “knout” (whip).

Varangian is supposed to be from Old Norse varingr “bound by a pledge” from var “pledge”, related to German wahr “true”. Though I have wondered if it might be related to the Franks (Ferenghi in Moslem Arab).

Rus is believed to be from Finnish Rus name given to the Varangians. Some think it may come from Ruotsi “rowers” of the Vikings, and Finnish Ruotsi the name for Sweden. Russia was called “Greater Sweden”.
Though Rurik was a Dane from Jutland, which would seem to conflict with the Sweden theory? His name is Scandinavian version of Roderick from hrod “fame” (compare Roger and Robert) + ric “power”. (Maybe Rus could be from Ruric/hrod? Maybe compare the Latin rural/rustic?)

A source is unclear whether Rus or Varangian may mean “foreigners”.

The three Russia(n)s “Great Russian” (Russian), Belorussian “White Russian”, and “Little Russian” (Ukrainian) are all related.
There is a Slavic goddess or spirit(s) named Rusalka/Rusalki?
I’m not sure if Prussian for Borussi might be related to Rus/Russia, though the Prussians were Baltic while the Russians are Slavic + Germanic (Rus/Varangians). (Compare name Boris maybe? Or there is a Slav or Balt deity named Perusan.)
There was also a state in Germany called Reuss.
Some relate Cyrillic alphabet script to Etruscan, so possibly Rus might be related to Etruscan?
I also had a brief theory that Rus/Russia might link with Tros (Troy/Trojan), and thus a continuation of the West versus East (Trojan War). Or maybe it could even relate to Greek euros “breadth” which word some derive Europe from?
There is also the similar Persian hero name Rustum/Rustem/Rustam.
Some think Rosh prince of Magog in one of the Major Prophets in the Bible may be Russia. Though rosh can mean “chief”, so it might be “chief prince of Magog”. The leader of Magog elsewhere seems to be Gog.

The Russians have a certain amount of Finnic (Finns, Lapps, Estonians, etc) blood, and also Mongol/Tatar blood and words from the Mongol/Tatar period. In my recent short study of Ukrainian history I noticed there were quite alot of Asiatic people passing through there including Huns, Bulgars, Avars, Magyars/Hungarians, Cumans, Khazars, Turks/Ottomans, Mongols/Tatars. There were also other people like Cimmerians, Scythians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, Alans, Goths, Antes, Genoese? Germans, etc.



Like this:

Like Loading…

This entry was posted on February 24, 2022 at 5:07 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Author: Jesse Powell